Publications

In the following please find the list of my publications separated into academic writings, publications in journals, workshops and conferences and a few further publications. In the list you will find the publications I co-authored together with my team in Oldenburg. A few publications listed are just authored by members of my team and I list them only here to show the activity of my team in this field. The publications together with external authors demonstrate our international cooperation with other teams in research projects and other scientific activities.
I would like to draw special attention to the conference publications of ACM Multimedia, CIKM, MobileHCI as well as CHI and Pervasive, which each haven an acceptance rate ranging from 13% to 22% and are each a prestigious conference in their field of research. We were awarded with best paper awards at MobileHCI 2011 and CHI 2012, which was a great success for our team.
Aiming at a high quality of the scientific education of our undergraduate and graduate students we submit the best annual results stemming from Bachelor thesis, Master thesis and student project to national and international workshops and conference. In recent we have been successful with this strategy and encouraged students to co-author publications accepted e.g., at CHI 2016, Mensch&Computer 2016, international Conference on Interation Design for Children 2016.

20192018201720162015201420132012201120102009200820072006200520042003< 2003

2019

Löcken, Andreas; Yan, Fei; Heuten, Wilko; Boll, Susanne

Investigating driver gaze behavior during lane changes using two visual cues: ambient light and focal icons Artikel

Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces, 2019, ISSN: 1783-8738.

Abstract | Links | BibTeX

@article{Löcken2019,
title = {Investigating driver gaze behavior during lane changes using two visual cues: ambient light and focal icons},
author = {Andreas Löcken and Fei Yan and Wilko Heuten and Susanne Boll},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s12193-019-00299-7},
doi = {10.1007/s12193-019-00299-7},
issn = {1783-8738},
year = {2019},
date = {2019-03-18},
journal = {Journal on Multimodal User Interfaces},
abstract = {Currently, lane change decision aid systems primarily address foveal vision and thus compete for drivers' attention with interfaces of other assistant systems. Also, alternative modalities such as acoustic perception (Mahapatra et al., in: 2008 International conference on advanced computer theory and engineering, pp 992--995. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACTE.2008.165, 2008), tactile perception (Löcken et al., in: Adjunct proceedings of the 7th international conference on automotive user interfaces and interactive vehicular applications, AutomotiveUI '15, pp 32--37. ACM, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/2809730.2809758, 2015), or peripheral vision (Löcken et al., in: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on automotive user interfaces and interactive vehicular applications, AutomotiveUI '15, pp 204--211. ACM, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/2799250.2799259, 2015), have been introduced for lane change support. We are especially interested in ambient light displays (ALD) addressing peripheral vision since they can adapt to the driver's attention using changing saliency levels (Matthews et al., in: Proceedings of the 17th Annual ACM symposium on user interface software and technology, UIST '04, pp 247--256, ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1029632.1029676, 2004). The primary objective of this research is to compare the effect of ambient light and focal icons on driving performance and gaze behavior. We conducted two driving simulator experiments. The first experiment evaluated an ambient light cue in a free driving scenario. The second one focused on the difference in gaze behavior between ALD and focal icons, called ``abstract faces with emotional expressions'' (FEE). The results show that drivers decide more often for safe gaps in rightward maneuvers with ambient light cues. Similarly, drivers decide to overtake more often when the gaps are big enough with both displays in the second experiment. Regarding gaze behavior, drivers looked longer towards the forward area, and less often and shorter into the side mirrors when using ALD. This effect supports the assumption that drivers perceive the ALD with peripheral vision. In contrast, FEE did not significantly affect the gaze behavior when compared to driving without assistance. These results help us to understand the effect of different modalities on performance and gaze behavior, and to explore appropriate modalities for lane change support.},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}

Schließen

Currently, lane change decision aid systems primarily address foveal vision and thus compete for drivers' attention with interfaces of other assistant systems. Also, alternative modalities such as acoustic perception (Mahapatra et al., in: 2008 International conference on advanced computer theory and engineering, pp 992--995. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACTE.2008.165, 2008), tactile perception (Löcken et al., in: Adjunct proceedings of the 7th international conference on automotive user interfaces and interactive vehicular applications, AutomotiveUI '15, pp 32--37. ACM, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/2809730.2809758, 2015), or peripheral vision (Löcken et al., in: Proceedings of the 7th international conference on automotive user interfaces and interactive vehicular applications, AutomotiveUI '15, pp 204--211. ACM, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/2799250.2799259, 2015), have been introduced for lane change support. We are especially interested in ambient light displays (ALD) addressing peripheral vision since they can adapt to the driver's attention using changing saliency levels (Matthews et al., in: Proceedings of the 17th Annual ACM symposium on user interface software and technology, UIST '04, pp 247--256, ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1029632.1029676, 2004). The primary objective of this research is to compare the effect of ambient light and focal icons on driving performance and gaze behavior. We conducted two driving simulator experiments. The first experiment evaluated an ambient light cue in a free driving scenario. The second one focused on the difference in gaze behavior between ALD and focal icons, called ``abstract faces with emotional expressions'' (FEE). The results show that drivers decide more often for safe gaps in rightward maneuvers with ambient light cues. Similarly, drivers decide to overtake more often when the gaps are big enough with both displays in the second experiment. Regarding gaze behavior, drivers looked longer towards the forward area, and less often and shorter into the side mirrors when using ALD. This effect supports the assumption that drivers perceive the ALD with peripheral vision. In contrast, FEE did not significantly affect the gaze behavior when compared to driving without assistance. These results help us to understand the effect of different modalities on performance and gaze behavior, and to explore appropriate modalities for lane change support.

Schließen

Steil, Julian; Koelle, Marion; Heuten, Wilko; Boll, Susanne; Bulling, Andreas

PrivacEye: Privacy-Preserving Head-Mounted Eye Tracking UsingEgocentric Scene Image and Eye Movement Features Inproceedings

Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Eye Tracking Research & Applications, ACM, Denver, CO, USA, 2019.

BibTeX